MediaMTXvsskyvern
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | skyvern | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 23 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | +237 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 26 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.0.56 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 75/100 for skyvern, so it is the safer default.
skyvern ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; skyvern needs more configuration.
MediaMTX details →skyvern details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep skyvern, compare it with