MediaMTXvsPhotoMigrator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | PhotoMigrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 50/100 for PhotoMigrator, so it is the safer default.
PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; PhotoMigrator needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →PhotoMigrator details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep PhotoMigrator, compare it with