MediaMTXvsopen-compute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | open-compute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 2 393 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.3.0 · 10 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 55/100 for open-compute, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for open-compute.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; open-compute needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →open-compute details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep open-compute, compare it with