MediaMTXvsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 17 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MediaMTX.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →Nomad details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep Nomad, compare it with