NomadvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Nomad | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 17 047 | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +78 | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 7 |
| Latest release | ent-changelog-1.10.18 · 28 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
Nomad details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep Nomad, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with