MediaMTXvsnamer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaMTX | namer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 118 in Media Server | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 20 538 | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +302 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.
MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; namer needs more configuration.
MediaMTX is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).
MediaMTX details →namer details →
Swap a project
Keep MediaMTX, compare it with
Keep namer, compare it with