MediaCMSvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 15 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for wyoming-piper.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →wyoming-piper details →