MediaCMSvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 39 757 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +776 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 13 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+776 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →Umami details →