MediaCMSvsThumbor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | Thumbor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 10 528 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 1 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 7.8.0 · 30 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Thumbor scores 72/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Thumbor.
If you want the quickest setup, Thumbor is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →Thumbor details →