MediaCMSvsTdarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | Tdarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 171 | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +46 | +37 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 0 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Makefile |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.
MediaCMS details →Tdarr details →