MediaCMSvsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 2 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →speech-to-phrase details →