MediaCMSvsscalar
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | scalar | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 5 172 | 16 337 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +148 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 46 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | release-2026-10-28-0d01943 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
scalar scores 76/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.
scalar ships more often: 46 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for MediaCMS.
If you want the quickest setup, scalar is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.
scalar is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →scalar details →