MediaCMSvsrudderstack
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | rudderstack | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 39 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for MediaCMS.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →rudderstack details →