MediaCMSvspikvm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | pikvm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #3 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 5 172 | 10 424 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 0 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | — |
Which one should you pick?
pikvm scores 72/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pikvm.
If you want the quickest setup, MediaCMS is easier to run; pikvm needs more configuration.
MediaCMS details →pikvm details →