WeChat Markdown Editorvswyoming-piper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WeChat Markdown Editor | wyoming-piper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 13 478 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +30 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.
wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WeChat Markdown Editor.
If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.
WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).
WeChat Markdown Editor details →wyoming-piper details →
Swap a project
Keep WeChat Markdown Editor, compare it with
Keep wyoming-piper, compare it with