WeChat Markdown Editorvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WeChat Markdown Editor | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 475 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | WTFPL | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
WeChat Markdown Editor scores 72/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
wanderer ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WeChat Markdown Editor.
If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; wanderer needs more configuration.
wanderer is growing faster right now (+131 stars in 30 days).
WeChat Markdown Editor details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep WeChat Markdown Editor, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with