WeChat Markdown Editorvsrefref
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WeChat Markdown Editor | refref | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #11 of 12 in Marketing Automation |
| GitHub stars | 13 476 | 239 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +28 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | WTFPL | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
WeChat Markdown Editor scores 72/100 against 44/100 for refref, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; refref needs more configuration.
WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
WeChat Markdown Editor details →refref details →
Swap a project
Keep WeChat Markdown Editor, compare it with
Keep refref, compare it with