MCSManagervsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MCSManager | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 62 in Game Servers | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 004 | 93 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +1 266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 19 |
| Latest release | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 266 stars in 30 days).
MCSManager details →uptime-kuma details →