Maza ad blockingvsNuma
Two self-hosted Pi-Hole alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Maza ad blocking | Numa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 41 in DNS | #16 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 875 | 1 952 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.25.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Numa scores 57/100 against 56/100 for Maza ad blocking, so it is the safer default.
Numa ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Maza ad blocking.
If you want the quickest setup, Maza ad blocking is easier to run; Numa needs more configuration.
Maza ad blocking is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).
Maza ad blocking details →Numa details → All Pi-Hole alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Maza ad blocking, compare it with
Keep Numa, compare it with