Mayan EDMSvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mayan EDMS | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 672 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-2.0-only | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 58/100 for Mayan EDMS, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Mayan EDMS.
UUSEC WAF is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).
Mayan EDMS details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Mayan EDMS, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with