Reactive ResumevsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 45 002 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 629 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with