Mayan EDMSvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mayan EDMS | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 672 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-2.0-only | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Typecho scores 66/100 against 58/100 for Mayan EDMS, so it is the safer default.
Typecho ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Mayan EDMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Mayan EDMS needs more configuration.
Typecho is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).
Mayan EDMS details →Typecho details →
Swap a project
Keep Mayan EDMS, compare it with
Keep Typecho, compare it with