Reactive ResumevsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reactive Resume | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 45 023 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 622 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 34 | 2 |
| Latest release | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).
Reactive Resume details →Typecho details →
Swap a project
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with
Keep Typecho, compare it with