Matrix-Telegram bridgevsZigbee2MQTT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matrix-Telegram bridge | Zigbee2MQTT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Bridges | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 1 752 | 15 762 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +11 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 15 |
| Latest release | v0.2610.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Zigbee2MQTT scores 76/100 against 65/100 for Matrix-Telegram bridge, so it is the safer default.
Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Matrix-Telegram bridge.
If you want the quickest setup, Zigbee2MQTT is easier to run; Matrix-Telegram bridge needs more configuration.
Zigbee2MQTT is growing faster right now (+102 stars in 30 days).
Matrix-Telegram bridge details →Zigbee2MQTT details →
Swap a project
Keep Matrix-Telegram bridge, compare it with
Keep Zigbee2MQTT, compare it with