MatomovsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matomo | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 6 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Matomo scores 74/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Matomo is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Matomo details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Matomo, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with