MastodonvsOpenScribe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | OpenScribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 2 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →OpenScribe details →