Mastodonvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 50 456 | 46 459 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Mastodon, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →mitmproxy details →