Martin Tile Servervszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Martin Tile Server | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 4 031 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 0 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 68/100 for Martin Tile Server, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+90 stars in 30 days).
Martin Tile Server details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with