Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 180 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 71/100 for Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with