Martin Tile Servervsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Martin Tile Server | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 4 030 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +92 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 18 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Martin Tile Server scores 68/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+92 stars in 30 days).
Martin Tile Server details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with