MarmotvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Marmot | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 10 in Data Management | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 627 | 1 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +64 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.11.1 · 11 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 50/100 for Marmot, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Marmot.
If you want the quickest setup, Marmot is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Marmot details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Marmot, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with