Market Research CockpitvsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Market Research Cockpit | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Finance | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 427 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 30 Aug 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Prysm scores 65/100 against 51/100 for Market Research Cockpit, so it is the safer default.
Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Market Research Cockpit.
If you want the quickest setup, Market Research Cockpit is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
Prysm is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
Market Research Cockpit details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep Market Research Cockpit, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with