Market Research CockpitvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Market Research Cockpit | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Finance | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 427 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 30 Aug 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 51/100 for Market Research Cockpit, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Market Research Cockpit.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
Market Research Cockpit details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Market Research Cockpit, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with