Mailcowvs墨台 · VibeHolding
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | 墨台 · VibeHolding | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 13 713 | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +215 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.
If you want the quickest setup, 墨台 · VibeHolding is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+215 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →墨台 · VibeHolding details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep 墨台 · VibeHolding, compare it with