docker-mailservervs墨台 · VibeHolding
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-mailserver | 墨台 · VibeHolding | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Mail Server | #24 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 702 | 186 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +829 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v16.0.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-mailserver scores 80/100 against 45/100 for 墨台 · VibeHolding, so it is the safer default.
docker-mailserver ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for 墨台 · VibeHolding.
If you want the quickest setup, 墨台 · VibeHolding is easier to run; docker-mailserver needs more configuration.
docker-mailserver is growing faster right now (+829 stars in 30 days).
docker-mailserver details →墨台 · VibeHolding details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-mailserver, compare it with
Keep 墨台 · VibeHolding, compare it with