MailcowvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 13 713 | 117 848 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +215 | +5 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 77/100 for Mailcow, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 489 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with