MailcowvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 13 715 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 7 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+205 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with