docker-mailservervsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-mailserver | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 16 in Mail Server | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 19 704 | 25 403 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +830 | +81 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 7 |
| Latest release | v16.0.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
docker-mailserver scores 80/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
SpacetimeDB ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for docker-mailserver.
If you want the quickest setup, SpacetimeDB is easier to run; docker-mailserver needs more configuration.
docker-mailserver is growing faster right now (+830 stars in 30 days).
docker-mailserver details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-mailserver, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with