MailcowvsPayload CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mailcow | Payload CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 106 in Email | #2 of 13 in Headless CMS |
| GitHub stars | 13 715 | 45 573 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | +641 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 20 |
| Latest release | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.92.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Payload CMS scores 83/100 against 77/100 for Mailcow, so it is the safer default.
Payload CMS ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Mailcow.
If you want the quickest setup, Payload CMS is easier to run; Mailcow needs more configuration.
Payload CMS is growing faster right now (+641 stars in 30 days).
Mailcow details →Payload CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Mailcow, compare it with
Keep Payload CMS, compare it with