MacOSvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MacOS | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 21 689 | 24 410 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +652 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 76/100 for MacOS, so it is the safer default.
MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Navidrome Music Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+652 stars in 30 days).
MacOS details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep MacOS, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with