e2bvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 593 | 24 410 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +655 | +652 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 | 15 |
| Latest release | @e2b/cli@2.23.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Navidrome Music Server.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b details →Navidrome Music Server details →