MacOSvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MacOS | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Virtualization | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 21 692 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.12 · 21 Aug 2026 | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
MacOS scores 76/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MacOS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; MacOS needs more configuration.
MacOS is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).
MacOS details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep MacOS, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with