LXDvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXD | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Virtualization | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 4 844 | 25 402 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +80 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 7 |
| Latest release | lxd-6.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 70/100 for LXD, so it is the safer default.
LXD ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
If you want the quickest setup, LXD is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.
SpacetimeDB is growing faster right now (+80 stars in 30 days).
LXD details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep LXD, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with