e2bvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 14 606 | 25 416 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +648 | +94 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 7 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 75/100 for SpacetimeDB, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
e2b is growing faster right now (+648 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →SpacetimeDB details →