LXCvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXC | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Containers | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 5 288 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0 · 30 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Java |
Which one should you pick?
LXC scores 70/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
LXC ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; LXC needs more configuration.
LXC is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
LXC details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep LXC, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with