cadvisorvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
cadvisor scores 72/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
cadvisor ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
cadvisor is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
cadvisor details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with