LXCvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXC | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Containers | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 288 | 44 998 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +1 625 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 34 |
| Latest release | v7.0.0 · 30 Apr 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 70/100 for LXC, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for LXC.
If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; LXC needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
LXC details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep LXC, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with