cadvisorvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| cadvisor | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 19 505 | 44 998 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +1 625 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.60.6 · 18 Sept 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 72/100 for cadvisor, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for cadvisor.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
cadvisor details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep cadvisor, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with