lurkervsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| lurker | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 41/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 85 in Feed Reader | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 327 | 65 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +315 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Pug | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 41/100 for lurker, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for lurker.
If you want the quickest setup, lurker is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
lurker details →nocodb details →