LumabrivsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Lumabri | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 42/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 7 in Local AI | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 203 | 56 878 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +149 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
Lumabri details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep Lumabri, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with